Back to articles

Public Historian’s Exhibition Success Undermined by Single Footnote in Local Newspaper

Label seven drew eleven thousand visitors, then one footnote on a Saturday.

Carmine Biancheri 3 min read The Historian's Hindsight
Public Historian’s Exhibition Success Undermined by Single Footnote in Local Newspaper

Front of house at the Mill Street Gallery opened on a Tuesday with an email printed and taped to the counter, which the duty volunteer read twice before deciding it was not a complaint about the café. It was from the editor of the Quarry County Register, forwarding footnote four of Saturday's feature on the mill centenary, and it began: Please look at this before the school groups arrive.

The school groups arrived anyway. They came for label seven, the most photographed panel in the room since a Lazlo Foundation interpretation grant paid for new labels in March. The exhibition, opened by the mayor, has logged just over eleven thousand visits.

Label seven tells you that Josiah Reamey, who built the drying sheds, warned the night shift minutes before the water came in October 1911 and stayed on the roof until everyone was counted. It is the emotional centre of the gallery.

Footnote four, four hundred words in a feature nobody was sent to read, cites the inventory of the Reamey estate from the Quarry County Probate Court, and the deed attached to it. Reamey sold the mill to the Carver syndicate in February. The flood was in October. The warning was signed by the mill's manager, Samuel Pike, a name that appears nowhere else in the exhibition.

"I didn't call it wrong," said Owen Petrie, who wrote the feature. "Footnotes don't call things wrong. They give you the page and let you do it yourself." The footnote drew more letters to the editor than the article drew readers.

The museum responded with a corrective card, smaller than label seven, mounted beneath it, stating that the warning was Pike's and that Reamey had already left the county. It has become the second most photographed object in the room.

Edith Marrow's monthly history update for January recorded that Reamey "is said to have warned the shift," citing a 1954 anniversary booklet printed by the mill widows' committee. The label copy, drafted from her update and approved at a meeting she was not invited to, dropped those three words. "I wrote three words of doubt and I watched nine people take them out," Marrow said. "I would just like the three words back, for the record, where they were."

A woman identifying herself as Pike's great-granddaughter arrived on Thursday with a photograph of a man on a shed roof and a family story about a rope. The photograph now has a case. The re-recorded audio guide now says the shift was warned and that records disagree on by whom, delivered in the same warm voice that had previously said Reamey saved everyone.

The forwarded email remains taped to the counter. The Register has promised a footnote two, concerning label twelve. The volunteer has not been told what to do about that, and has decided, correctly, that the instruction will arrive in print.

Share this article

Comments (4)

RG
Remy Gade September 29, 2026
Sir, eleven thousand visitors attended label seven in good faith. If footnote four wished to object, it had ample opportunity during the centenary. To emerge on a Saturday, when the historian cannot summon a quorum of historians, is discourteous.
OJ
Oona Juma September 29, 2026
I would reserve judgment until the footnote has cooled. At present I detect strong notes of Saturday and a forward finish, but very little provenance.
ED
Enzo Dastur September 29, 2026
Eleven thousand people! For one label! I've cycled to exhibitions where the entire eighteenth century barely justified a biscuit. Now an editor has forwarded a footnote and I need a pie.
NT
Nia Taneja September 29, 2026
The email was read twice and found not to concern the café. The café therefore remains the only department formally cleared. Motion to hold all future history there.

Showing 4 of 4 comments