Back to articles

"Just One More Session Zero Topic," Says GM, Opening Page 11 of Expectations

Page 11 schedules the revisions to the other ten pages.

Odelia Manansala 3 min read The Tabletop Tribune
"Just One More Session Zero Topic," Says GM, Opening Page 11 of Expectations

Item 12, read aloud at the table on the fourth attempt: Expectations Regarding Unsolicited Lore. Please indicate whether you wish to receive lore in advance, at the table, by written handout exceeding one page, or never. If "never," please explain. If the explanation exceeds one page, please summarize.

That item sits inside a packet of eleven tabbed, hole-punched, sheet-protected pages assembled by Priya Sundell, the game master, nine weeks after Session Zero was booked to settle four things: dates, boundaries, who brings snacks, and how the group will know if someone is having a bad time. Those four things are on page one. Page eleven is a schedule for revising the sections that produced page eleven.

"I would rather write it down once than have the same conversation four times," Sundell said. The group has now had that conversation four times, three of them at the table, in writing.

Because Sundell wants everyone holding the same object, the campaign's most reliably consumed product is the sheet protector. "Four boxes of sheet protectors in a month," said Tessa Caldwell, who runs the shop where the group buys dice. "The month before, I sold her dice." The tab dividers are a standing order now. Filed under Laleh's Purchase Order: a campaign's first purchase is no longer a rulebook.

Ada Gable, who lives with one enthusiast of tabletop roleplaying, read the packet end to end and asked a single question: how long does this take to read aloud? That question is now item 13, with a stated answer of eleven minutes, and the answer is wrong because item 13 was added after the timing was done.

Amendments are handled under the procedure on page nine: a written motion, a second, a 48-hour comment window, and a quorum. Ada Rourke, a fixture of the local standards board whose rulings are quoted far more often than they are read, weighed in. "An expectation the group cannot locate in the document is not recorded," Rourke said. "It is a rumor with professional formatting." The motion to cap the document at its current length was filed under that procedure.

At the last gathering the packet was opened at 7:04 and closed at 7:54; play followed for forty minutes, and none of it touched lore. "Once the framework is done, we never revisit it," Sundell said, and then reopened the framework to log the group's reaction to having reopened it.

On Sunday the cap was approved. It runs one sentence, occupies the top of page 13, and records the expectation that the document grow no further. Getting the wording right took twenty minutes, a motion, a second, and a comment window that closed Tuesday morning with no comments, which the packet asks everyone to note as a comment.

Share this article

Comments (2)

MS
Miro Sethi September 30, 2026
"Never" is ambiguous. I assume it means after the packet. Otherwise the explanation becomes unsolicited lore about why you dislike unsolicited lore. Our table resolved this by defining "receive." We lost February.
LG
Lior Girma September 30, 2026
Nine weeks and eleven pages. Fine. But if Priya calls this a one-shot, I'm bringing the minutes.

Showing 2 of 2 comments