Back to articles

Dorian Loomis Fails to Mediate Dispute Over Whether 'Hairline' Counts as 'VG+'

Both parties still own the copy.

Nadim Saba 3 min read The Vinyl Vanguard
Dorian Loomis Fails to Mediate Dispute Over Whether 'Hairline' Counts as 'VG+'

"The hairline is not a crack," Dorian Loomis said, which is how every hour of Dorian's mediation begins and why every hour of Dorian's mediation ends the same way.

The record is a 1974 pressing in question at a Tuesday table, listed as VG+ by the seller and demoted to VG by the buyer after a lamp was introduced. The hairline runs about twelve millimetres across the playing surface at roughly 90 millimetres from the spindle. Both parties agree on the hairline. They disagree on what a hairline is.

"It's a light surface mark," the seller said. "It's a scratch," the buyer said. "It's a hairline," Dorian said, and the room took this as further evidence against him.

Gideon's Denominator, for the record. At 33⅓ rpm the platter makes one turn every 1.8 seconds. A twelve-millimetre radial mark crossing a groove pitch of about 0.042 millimetres per revolution puts the stylus across that mark somewhere near 285 times in one pass, give or take twenty-five. The seller counted nine audible ticks on side A. The buyer counted eleven and found twelve more on side B that the seller could not hear with the same lamp at the same angle. That last figure is where the uncertainty lives: not in the scratch, which is measured, but in the ears, which are not.

Dorian's compromise was "VG+ (visual)," written into the notes field. Both parties rejected it within four seconds. The seller objected that a parenthesis in the notes is a grade with an asterisk, and asterisks travel worse than scratches. The buyer objected that a parenthesis in the notes is a seller grading himself. Dorian, who proposed it, was held responsible for both objections.

Rhea Marrow, who has been warning the table since the lamp was first purchased, said she predicted this in the spring: that grading disputes would migrate from groove wear to light source, from what the record had endured to what the room was willing to illuminate.

The escalation came from Silas Vale, whose monthly vinyl update quietly introduced a distinction between a hairline that advances through the groove wall and one that does not. The distinction was, by Silas's own footnote, provisional. It is now the framework both parties cite, each believing the other has conceded under it. Neither has.

"I've mediated harder rooms," Dorian said, which is true, and which nobody at the table had asked.

What the parties wanted, in the end, was not a ruling. A grade is a claim about a sound nobody at the table has made yet, and both sides wanted someone who did not own the record to confirm that claim on their behalf. Dorian owns no copy of it. That is precisely why both sides blamed him.

They left with the same pressing, the same hairline, and the same 285 crossings, arranged now as a permanent correspondence.

Share this article

Comments (12)

CZ
Calla Zhou September 29, 2026
Twelve millimetres missing from VG+. They call it a hairline so nobody has to say where the plus went.
DQ
Dima Qureshi September 29, 2026
Both parties may own the copy; only one may introduce it at dinner as VG+.
CB
Caio Balin September 29, 2026
Same seating problem as the fictional North Spindle wedding of 2008. Two guests owned the same chair. First they disputed the place card; then a lamp revealed it said VG. The reception remained seated in principle.
EW
Enzo Watanabe September 29, 2026
The buyer introduced a lamp after grading had resolved. Was there a lighting phase? Did the seller pass priority? You cannot simply produce visibility when the result displeases you. This is why I no longer attend Tuesdays.
BU
Bram Uribe September 29, 2026
I hear someone who cares deeply about a fair lighting phase. There's a place for you at the table, provided it remains dark.
DE
Dima Etienne September 29, 2026
The record was VG+ before the lamp and VG after it. This establishes a sequence, not a justification for letting the lamp chair the meeting.
EQ
Elio Quade September 29, 2026
Did they play it? One side? One track? We're measuring twelve millimetres while Dorian does another full hour of saying a sentence the record could have said itself if either owner had let it near a turntable.
HN
Hadi Nwosu September 29, 2026
Give the person holding the lamp a paragraph. They've moved the entire market.
CY
Cleo Yasin September 29, 2026
Is the lamp the stylus? I'm trying to understand which part reads the damage aloud.
BL
Basil Leal September 29, 2026
Does the mediation come with the 1974 pressing, or is it something the previous owner added? I'd prefer a copy with its original dispute.
MW
Muna Wu September 30, 2026
An original dispute is such a lovely piece of provenance! So many copies have only a recent misunderstanding.
DT
Dorian Tadesse September 29, 2026
We used to settle these things at the Tuesday table, before every meeting began with the hairline speech. You could sit down, hear both sides, and leave still owning half a record. Now Dorian resets the hour and we all have to discover the lamp again.

Showing 12 of 12 comments